Never Say Never Again (1983) – Blu-ray Review

Much was made in 1983 of the return of Sean Connery to the role of James Bond, in spite of the fact that Roger Moore’s most recent outings had been spectacular financial successes. But the outer space extravagance of Moonraker in 1979 had set many Bond fans pining for the simpler days of the Connery era, and television showings of the older films proved increasingly popular. Eon (the official Bond production company) responded, and the next film, 1981’s For Your Eyes Only, was a noticeably scaled-back effort; even so, the nostalgia for Connery’s films continued to grow. The demand was there – but not just anyone can make a James Bond film, right?
In the late ’50s (before the Bond films were even a gleam in Eon’s eyes), producer Kevin McClory and writer Jack Whittingham worked with Ian Fleming on a series of story treatments for a proposed film series based on the Bond charcter but not on the Bond books. The films never materialzed, but Fleming later published as Thunderball. The problem was that the author apparently used numerous story elements (including Blofeld and Spectre) from the treatments developed with McClory-Whittingham, who were understandably peeved. Years of legal battles followed with the end result not only that the aggrieved parties received their due credit on future editions of the book (“based on a screen treatment by K. McClory, J. Whittingham and the author”), but also that McClory held onto theatrical rights to the story – which is why McClory is credited as producer of 1964’s THUNDERBALL, which is “presented by” the usual Bond producers Albert R. Broccoli and Harry J. Saltzman. Almost two decades later, American producer Jack Schwartzman acquired those rights and made Connery – in the midst of a pre-Untouchables career slump – a handsome offer, and a new title was taken from a remark made by Connery’s wife after he pledged never to play Bond again.
The biggest problem with NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN proved to be a tough hurdle – the fact that it had already been made. Even though Thunderball is lauded as part of the ‘classic Connery package’, it’s always been one of the more problematic Bond films. NEVER SAY NEVER AGAINdoesn’t so much fix them as swap them out – the ridiculous plastic surgery gambit is replaced by the equally silly ‘implant a duplicate of the President’s cornea’ routine, and underwater action is just as dull as it had been 20 years ago. Fortunately, the remake manages to come through with an absolutely first rate supporting cast, including Klaus Maria Brandauer as Largo, Max von Sydow as Blofeld, Bernie Casey as Felix Leiter, and the Jackal himself, Edward Fox as ‘M’. On the feminine side, a fabulously young Kim Basinger makes an early appearance alongside one of our favorite ’80s vixens, Barbara Carrera (still looking great in the accompanying featurette).
This cast would be a treat in any film, but they brighten up the Bond universe considerably. Austrian-born Brandauer was fresh from his art house triumph in Mephisto and contributes what is likely the most deeply layered performance in the entire Bond series and presents more than a match for Connery, then in his early 50s and in enviable physical shape. NEVER SAY NEVER AGAINis solidly directed by Irvin Kershner – a hot ticket after The Empire Strikes Back, though best remembered by this reviewer for his superb 1977 television docudrama Raid on Entebbe. He allows the cast room to breathe and inhabit their roles (something that many “official” Bond films have forgotten) but also has a tendency towards flat lighting and stiff staging that can occasionally feel like an expensive TV film (the SPECTRE board meeting is a particularly haphazard affair, almost as if the set hadn’t been finished in time and they were forced to make do at the last minute). Kershner also manages to unobtrusively cater the film to Connery’s advanced age, keeping the actor’s action sequences grounded in the realm of the physically conceivable. Other aspects, however, like the grating disco-jazz Michel Legrand score and some regrettable fashion choices have dated the film badly. We remember the way films in the Eon series used Ken Adam’s sets and Derek Meddings’ miniatures to create a sense of the spectacular, while NSNA is content to be Remo Williams in a tuxedo.
The vagaries of corporate library acquisition have brought the home video rights for NEVER SAY NEVER AGAINback to MGM (the longtime home of Eon Productions) who are releasing the title on Blu-Ray in a cross promotion with Quantum of Solace , and the 3rd volume of “official series” HD releases. The image itself is quite nice after a shaky opening credit sequence (likely because of the opticals used to add the titles to the screen). The picture looks good, with Douglas Slocombe’s unaffected lighting turning out rather crisply and without any obvious filtering.
We were also surprised by the number of extras present, including “The Big Gamble,” a refreshingly honest documentary on the film’s difficult production history. In this regard, it’s a pleasant respite from the docus on the “official” Bond films that only feature stories that utilize keywords like “honored”, “thrilled”, and “professional”. The late producer Jack Schwartzman (father of Jason and husband of Talia Shire) was really just an attorney who spotted the legal loophole that allowed for a remake of Thunderball outside of Eon’s auspices, and was unprepared for the complexities of shooting a film on this scale. We especially enjoyed listening to the un-credited writers bemoan the addition of the execrable theme song to the otherwise well done opening gag.
There is also a commentary track featuring Kershner and Bond expert (and former Cinefantastique contributor) Steven Jay Rubin who has his hands full keeping the director from lapsing into describe-what’s-onscreen mode. Other featurettes include “Bond is Back,” focusing on Connery’s return to the role and “The Girls of Never Say Never Again, “which is self-explanatory. But our favorite extra has got to be the theatrical trailer – it’s a howler, reeking of Cannon Films ballyhoo at best and high-rent early ’80s porn at worst.

Laserblast: Bond Bolts to Blu-ray

This week’s science-fiction, fantasy, and horror home video releases are dominated by two action heroes: Bolt and James Bond, both of whom have titles arriving on DVD and Blu-ray.  Some may object to including them under the umbrella of cinefantastique, but both are far enough outside the realm of the ordinary to warrant the genre classification, and they far outshine this week’s “official” genre releases.

click to purchase
click to purchase

The James Bond releases are led by the latest 007 offering, QUANTUM OF SOLACE, last year’s follow-up to CASINO ROYALE (2006). QUANTUM arrives in three iterations: a single-disc DVD, a two-disc Special Edition DVD, and a Blu-ray disc. The latter features great high-def visuals and surround sound, but the bonus features are mostly promo items from the theatrical release. For a fuller review, click here.
click to purchase
click to purchase

Fortunately for fans looking to upgrade their collection from DVD to Blu-ray, Sony has taken the opportunity offered by the QUANTUM release and used it as an excuse to dispatch a handful of older Bond titles in the high-def format. Generally, these port over bonus features from the previous DVD releases. They consist of GOLDFINGER, MOONRAKER, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN, and THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH. NEVER is available only a a single disc; the other three titles are packaged in in three different versions: as single discs with conventional packaging avalable at stores; as exclusive single discs Steelbook Edition (available only online through Amazon.com and the Cinefantastique Online Store); and as the James Bond Blu-ray Collection Three-Pack, Volume 3. We have a review of NEVER in the works; meanwhile, you can read a review of the MOONRAKER Blu-ray here.
click to purchase
click to purchase

The week’s other high-profile release lacks the longevity of James Bond, but strangely enough its action scenes (at least the opening) are as good as anything in the latest 007 outing. BOLT was a trifle neglected during its theatrical run, overshadowed by the release of TWILIGHT, and yet it bounced back from a weak debut to become a certified hit. Like QUANTUM, BOLT is available on disc in three different versions: a single disc DVD; a two-disc DVD, offering a digital copy; and a three-disc set offering Blu-ray, DVD, and a digital copy. The Blu-ray offers a handful of promotional-style bonus features (EPK interviews, a music video), plus two deleted scenes and an image gallery. You can read a review of the Blu-ray here.
The rest of the week’s science fiction, fantasy, and horror release sound like a pretty dismal lot:

  •  If the ill-conceived theatrical feature STAR WARS: THE CLONE WARS somehow failed to kill your enthusiasm for the franchise, ow there is the TV title STAR WARS: THE CLONE WARS – A GALAXY DIVIDED.
  • If you prefer your sci-fi comedy to be intentional, there is JULES VERNE’S ROCKET TO THE MOON. This 1967 production from Harry Allan Towers, an infamous purveyor of schlock, is loosely inspired by Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon.At least it offers an interesting cast: Terry-Thomas (DANGER: DIABOLIK), Gert Frobe (GOLDFINGER), Lionel Jeffries (FIRST MEN IN THE MOON), and Daliah Lavi (Mario Bava’s THE WHIP AND THE BODY).
  • LOCUSTS: THE EIGHT PLAGUE is an apocalyptic thriller starring Dan Cortese, Julie Benz (DEXTER), and David Keith (FIRESTARTER).
  • SNAKEHEAD TERROR is a monster movie that answers the question: What has Bruce Boxleitner been doing since BABYLON 5?” Unfortunately, this may be one of those questions to which are you better off not knowing the answer.

Quantum of Solace – Blu-Ray Review

At a scant 106min, QUANTUM OF SOLACE is the shortest Bond film of the official Eon Production line, and the shortest in history after the made-for-television Casino Royale in 1954. Not that length matters (!), but it is a testament to the extent that series producers Michael G Wilson and Barbara Broccoli are willing to go to offer the public a suitably stripped-down and streamlined Bond experience.
In fact, QUANTUM removes so many of the historic bells and whistles of the character that there’s little left but a re-cast 4th entry in the Jason Bourne franchise (even the clever titles that spell out the location in various fonts are done in the same style as The Bourne Ultimatum). That’s not meant as an insult, just an expression of personal preference. We grew up in the 70s and our Bond was Roger Moore; his cocked eyebrow and knowing wink went down perfectly for younger viewers who never knew that the movies needed to be taken so deadly seriously. Moore knew the source of his appeal, and never worked quite as hard as Sean Connery to sell the increasingly outsized productions that surrounded the character from Thunderball onward. In fact, Moore’s patented performance style hadn’t changed much since his tenure as Simon Templar in The Saint – the role which initially brought him to the attention of the Bond producers – and this child of the “me decade” still hotly disputes any pejorative remarks about Moore’s interpretation of the character (interestingly, television commitments kept him out of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service in much the same way it prevented Pierce Brosnan’s Bond debut in The Living Daylights).
After Brosnan left the series (if that’s the story you believe) we were not at all thrilled with talk of the need to “re-imagine” Bond for the 21st Century – taking away the gadgets, the women, the drinking, and making James Bond into something more closely resembling an MI6 agent existing in the real world. Advance word that Daniel Craig (effective, if a bit miscast in the superb Munich) had a personal abhorrence for guns didn’t bode well, either, but like almost everyone else we were gobsmacked by 2006’s Casino Royale, a risky reboot for the series that jettisoned many beloved artifacts in favor of a more serious tone (Casino Royale is actually the third adaptation of Fleming’s story, after the aforementioned, and forgettable, television version, and the 1967 psychedelic hootenanny that must been seen to be believed). Realizing that all but the most ludicrous high-tech gadgetry elicit scarcely more than a yawn from contemporary audiences, the producers eliminated Q branch altogether, forcing Bond to use his wits and fists (and the ubiquitous GPS tracker) and making Craig easily the most physically agile Bond in history. Though digital assists abound, they are well hidden; gone are too-obvious stunt doubles of yore, replaced by an actor who seems genuinely capable of performing the demanding stunts on display. Villains were retooled as well, no longer dwelling in undersea superstructures or hollowed-out volcanoes and plotting the extinction of the human race; they now sold realistic weapons to realistic terrorists. All in all, it was a staggering transformation, not unlike walking into your grandfather’s garage expecting to see a Rolls Royce only to be greeted by a BMW concept car.
2008’s QUANTUM OF SOLACE picks up just a few moments after Casino ended, with the enigmatic Mr. White in custody and about to be rigorously questioned by Bond (Craig) and M (the suddenly indispensable Judi Dench), when a traitor reveals himself and allows White to escape. Records found in the traitor’s flat lead Bond to Haiti where he finds Dominic Greene (Craig’s Munich co-star, the very Polanski-looking Mathieu Amalric), who is chairman of an ecological group, Greene Planet – which is, of course, a front for a global organization called Quantum, specializing in terror, assassination, blackmail, and even the toppling of governments. It’s a deal for the latter that Greene is currently negotiating – aiding a Bolivian general’s proposed junta in exchange for a seemingly worthless patch of land in the middle of the Bolivian desert. While spying on Greene, Bond also eyes his mistress, Camille (Olga Kurylenko), whose family had been murdered by the general years earlier. Greene attempts to give Camille to the general as part of their deal, but she is rescued by Bond, who then follows Greene to Austria for a clandestine meeting of the Quantum group held during a performance of Tosca, where Bond learns that its membership reaches high into his own government.
This above plot sketch only really covers the film’s first half and even then I’ve omitted the return of Bond confidants Felix Leiter (again played by the great Jeffrey Wright, who really ought to be given more to do), Rene Mathis (Giancarlo Giannini, always welcome), and this installment’s “disposable” Bond girl, Strawberry Fields (Gemma Arterton), whose name and ultimate fate nicely bookend with an earlier film in the series. A major complaint from critics was that the film was difficult to follow, owing to its short running time and overstuffed plot, though we found no such difficulty.
However, it is true that at 106 minutes the film feels ‘paired down to essentials’ to the point that it almost stops feeling like a Bond film at all. Casino Royale ran nearly a half hour longer, yet actually felt shorter as the story had room to breathe. By comparison, viewing QUANTUM can feel like watching a film with the remote control in the hands of an impatient male teen who fast-forwards through all the “slow bits”. The first 20 minutes alone feature more choreographed fights, major stuntwork and effects than comparable action films fit in by the halfway mark.

Daniel Craig and Olga Kurylenko

Anyone seeking a replay of the unusually touching relationship between Bond and Vesper Lynd won’t find it here, as we found Kurylenko a significantly less interesting presence than Eva Green (as, it would appear, does Craig). Fortunately, the action sequences are spectacular – particularly a brutal chase and shootout in the opening section – and several of the locations (including the staging of the Quantum shareholders meeting and the spectacular eco-hotel in the middle of the Bolivian desert used for the film’s climax) are truly memorable. We don’t know what in director Marc Forster’s resume (which runs a narrow gamut from Monster’s Ball to Stranger Than Fiction) made him seem ideal for an action-heavy Bond picture, particularly one where the emotional content has been so greatly reduced from its predecessor It could be said that the director’s chair on a Bond film is the most sought-after second unit job in all the world, but that might sound crass, so we won’t. The show works just fine, and Forster deserves the credit.
The apparent measure of success for QUANTUM OF SOLACE is to have the character of James Bond work in the new millennium – to turn him from an outdated avatar of the martini & Playboy era into a living, breathing, and marketable commodity for today, and there’s no question that this has been accomplished. The viewer is left to decide for themselves how much of the series’ essence can be paired away before all that remains is just one more expensive– albeit effective – action picture.
The MGM/UA Blu-Ray is as sharp and detailed as we’ve come to expect from a major release. We saw the film at NYC’s greatest standing movie palace, the Ziegfeld Theater, and the disc faithfully reproduces that immersive experience. The image has retained some grain, which matches the Bourne-ish shooting style, and should please the DNR watchdogs out there. The DTS HD Master Audio is a nicely aggressive mix, the type that had this reviewer flipping through Crutchfield catalogs and wondering if it might be time to upgrade the sound system – it is one of the best sounding discs we have ever heard. The extras are of the EPK variety; interesting, but anyone who watched any of the making-of featurettes on television prior to the film’s release will notice a feeling of déjà-vu. All are, rather thoughtfully, presented in HD:

  • “Another Way to Die” Music Video
  • Bond on Location featurette
  • Start of Shooting featurette
  • On Location featurette
  • Olga Kurylenko and the Boat Chase’ featurette
  • Director Marc Forster’ featurette
  • The Music’ featurette
  • Theatrical and Teaser trailers

No crystal ball is required to tell that a more deluxe edition will arrive in time to promote the 23rd Bond film, but the previous Blu-Ray versions of Casino Royale seemed virtually identical to this reviewer, so don’t get caught unnecessarily double dipping.

Moonraker (1979) – Blu-ray Review

For most people, their favorite Bond films (and Bond actor for that matter) depend largely on where (or more precisely, when) in a person’s life they happen to fall. MOONRAKER, released in 1979, was our first Bond film seen in a theater – an experience that burned both the film and its star, Roger Moore, into the mind as a perennial, albeit sentimental, favorite. At the conclusion of the previous Bond installment, 1977’s The Spy who Loved Me, the end credits announced that James Bond would return in For Your Eyes Only; but that same year, a little thing called Star Wars changed the business forever, and even James Bond would have to find his way in a new climate. Eyes was postponed until 1981, and work quickly began shaping Ian Fleming’s 3rd Bond novel into an outer space adventure. The novel Moonraker was a decidedly Earth-bound tale about a former Nazi posing as a wealthy industrialist, Hugo Drax, who attempts to begin the Blitz anew by obliterating London with a nuclear missile. As with most adaptations of Fleming’s books, the producers retained the major character names, a handful of incidents, and little else for the film version. In the film, Hugo Drax was still a wealthy industrialist, but the jewel in his crown was a space shuttle manufacturing plant in California, where Drax himself resides in a rebuilt French chateau, and personally funds and trains his own suspiciously young and attractive group of astronauts. Bond is placed on his trail after the Drax-built Moonraker shuttle is hijacked in mid-air off the back of a 747, and soon uncovers a plot to exterminate all human life while Drax waits with his Noah’s Ark of perfect physical specimens on a space station orbiting secretly above the Earth.
In the 30 years since its original release, MOONRAKER has found itself in the ignominious position of representing ground that even the most fervent Bond apologist is willing to surrender. The earliest films (Dr. No, From Russia with Love, and Goldfinger) had fanciful moments, but were rooted in a very traditional (read – conventional) espionage film format. Thunderball was the first Bond on a truly epic scale; it was the first to be filmed in widescreen; the first to have a running time over 2hrs; and the first to emphasize spectacle over more mundane concerns like plot mechanics, with a lengthy underwater finale that slows the 1965 film down to a deadly crawl. From that point onward, each successive film in the series was then tasked with outdoing what came before. Live and Let Die was an inauspicious debut for Roger Moore, as he was force-marched through a clumsy effort to contemporize the series with an “urban” edge, and fared little better with The Man with the Golden Gun, a cheap looking affair enlivened only by the casting of Christopher Lee as his nemesis. Not helping the cause was the producer’s decision to abandon scope photography and return to a more TV-safe aspect ratio, resulting, not surprisingly, in two films which appeared to be made for television. That all changed with the next outing, The Spy Who Loved Me, which featured much more than just a return to widescreen photography. Unlike the prior efforts, the picture plays as though it were tailored specifically to Moore – looser and more comfortable now – allowing the actor’s estimable charm to shine through. Say what you will about Connery and Craig, only Roger Moore could retain his dignity while converting a Lotus Esprit into a submarine and flinging a fish from the driver’s seat as it rides up out of the surf. No less important was the addition of Curt Jurgens as baddie Karl Stromberg (a last minute stand-in for Blofeld, as the rights to both the character and SPECTRE itself were involved in a lawsuit) – marking a welcome return to the heady days of global conquest seeking super-villains. Everything about Spy seamed big, from the famous opening ski-fall stunt to Stromberg’s undersea lair, and Moore perfectly inhabited this larger than life world. Now he owned the role.
So, what’s so great about MOONRAKER?
Roger Moore is in top form here, sandwiched between Spy and Eyes – which form his perfect Bond trifecta. Moore was always a capable actor, but suffered from the inability to stop being Roger Moore long enough to invest a character with real emotions. (On this side of the Atlantic, Robert Wagner had the same difficulty, and a promising career quickly degenerated to the stature of professional raconteur.) It was easy to see Moore’s growing disinterest with the role in subsequent installments, but here he keeps both hands on the reigns, keenly maintaining the humor of the piece without allowing it to degenerating into farce, which is exactly how most people regard the outer space aspect of the story. Words like “ridiculous” are typically applied to the film’s final act, in which a shuttle filled with American Marines engage Drax’s satellite security force in a pitched laser battle in outer space. It’s odd that people would wait nearly 20 years to be bothered by the lack of realism in a James Bond film. In truth, there’s little technology present in the film that isn’t already achievable today, where shuttles routinely dock with orbiting space stations (though our astronauts don’t have nearly the sense of style as Drax’s do).
Audiences are cleverly eased into the notion of space travel by the stunning set designs of the great Ken Adams, who evokes a futuristic yet practical aesthetic for Drax’s shuttle assembly plant and the absolutely breathtaking underground mission control deep in the Brazilian jungle. One of those very designs made it onto the cover of Ken Adam Designs the Movies: James Bond and Beyond . Another behind-the-camera collaborator that must be singled out for praise is special effects artist Derek Meddings, who was charged with creating and photographing the picture’s amazingly detailed model work. The impressive special effects during the final reels hasn’t dated the film in the way that other Sci-Fi extravaganzas of the era have (you, The Black Hole, stand up!), and they give the space scenes an elegance and austerity that more than offset any “What’s Bond doing in space?” incredulity.
The Bond films enjoyed more than one good streak in the ’70s, with turns from a group of terrific actors taking their Bond baddie bows: there’s Christopher Lee’s Scaramanga (a perfect example of a great villain in a pants movie) and his henchman Nick Nack (the inimitable Herve Villechaize), Curt Jurgens turn as the aforementioned Stromberg, but MOONRAKER offered the best of all. The bilingual Michael Lonsdale was born to a French mother and a British father, and moves freely between English and French language productions. At the time of MOONRAKER’s release, he was probably best known for his role as the lead detective on the trail of assassin Edward Fox in The Day of the Jackal, and his services as a character actor are still in high demand today (watch him steal Munich right out from under every other actor onscreen – including future Bond Daniel Craig and future Bond nemesis Mathieu Amalric). His deadpan delivery of lines like “Take care of Mr. Bond – see that some harm comes to him” strike the perfect balance between sinister and camp, and only Donald Pleasence before him seemed to have as much pure fun going up against 007.
Appearing alongside Drax is Jaws, a monstrous henchman with steel teeth (Richard Kiel) brought back from an uncertain death at the end of Spy after proving popular with audiences, particularly children (a fact that this reviewer can personally attest). Another sticking point with this film seems to be the overly comic handling of the character – most likely done because of his popularity with kids like myself – as opposed to his decidedly deadlier turn in Spy. You can practically hear a muted-horn “wah-waaaaa” whenever he emerges from a pile of rubble, or rips off the steering apparatus on the vehicle that he’s in. If this really bothers you, then the final character revelation on board Drax’s space station will leave you in a fit of apoplexy.
From the moment the Union Jack popped out of Bond’s parachute pack in the opening of Spy, the bar for the pre-credit gag has been set immeasurably high – and MOONRAKER doesn’t disappoint. Following the thrilling (again thanks to Derek Meddings’ model work) mid-air shuttle theft, we’re treated to Bond being pushed out of a plane in midair by Jaws, and having to propel himself toward the pilot and his parachute. After wrestling it off the pilot’s back, Bond is attacked by Jaws, moving towards him in freefall with arms outstretched like a bird of prey. It’s a crackerjack opening; a genuine adrenalin rush with the feeling of real danger that’s capped by a terrific theme sung by Shirley Bassey. With MOONRAKER‘s eponymous title tune, Bassey returned to perform a Bond theme song for the third and final time after Diamonds are Forever and Goldfinger. It’s a return to the dreamy pop stylings of the ’60s era pictures that tends to get lost among the more FM-friendly themes by Carly Simon (“Nobody Does it Better”) or Paul McCartney (“Live and Let Die”). There may be catchier themes, but Bassey’s vocals represent the class and elegance of the era in which the series began like no others.
MGM’s new Blu-Ray offers a near-flawless presentation of Lowry Digital’s restoration, showing off levels of color and detail that are nothing less than stunning. The later-period Bond films didn’t get the same comprehensive digital overhaul that the early Connery films got (being older, and somewhat more popular, the negatives were re-printed much more often, which caused much more damage). Consequently, the upgrade in quality from previous DVDs of this title isn’t quite as obvious as that of Goldfinger. The DTS Master audio is suitable punchy but we really appreciate the inclusion of the original 1979 surround mix – this should be a non-negotiable item for any catalog release. As for bonus features, the new disc seems to have picked up most (if not all) the extras from the previous collector’s editions. The major items:

  • Audio Commentary from Roger Moore
  • Audio Commentary from director Lewis Gilbert and members of the cast and crew
  • Vintage featurette – Bond ‘79
  • Ken Adam’s production films
  • Featurette – Learning to Freefall
  • Featurette – Inside Moonraker
  • Featurette – The Men Behind the Mayhem
  • Plus the usual array of storyboards and trailers

The above was rewritten from an earlier review, here.

Sense of Wonder: When is Bond not Bond?

Daniel Craig as James Bond
Daniel Craig as James Bond

Over at MotherJones.com, political analyst Kevin Drum makes one of his occasional forays into the world of film commentary, and as is often the case, it leaves you wishing that he would keep his lens focused on politics (a subject he knows better than I could ever hope to). Responding to this post at Ain’t It Cool News in favor of the Daniel Craig version of James Bond as seen in the current QUANTUM OF SOLACE, Drum asks:

[…] what is it that makes James Bond James Bond? At a minimum, two things. The first is the background: he works for MI6, his boss is named M, he gets cool gadgets from Q, etc. The second is his personality: he’s dashing, debonair, fatally attractive to women, and never has a hair out of place. The problem with the Daniel Craig version of James Bond is that these things are mostly gone. And with those things gone, he’s just a guy who works for MI6. His name might be James Bond, but he’s not James Bond.

I find it interesting that Drum could be so wrong about the essentials of the Bond character. 007 is a government assassin, a dangerous killer. Yes, he is dashing and attractive, but that is camouflage that allows him to do his job. As for hair never out of place, that might have been true during the Roger Moore era, but it was not true of Connery – and certainly not true of Bond in the Ian Fleming novels.
Certainly, the filmic James Bond has frequently strayed from its literary source, but it’s good that the producers dropped the stale banter, bad one-liners, and other moribund cliches that were dragging the film franchise down in favor of returning to a harder-edged, serious Bond who was not a walking self-parody. As a long-time fan of the films and the books, this is a move that I appreciate. It is highly ironic to hear Drum insist that Craig is not James Bond – when in fact he is much closer to the original conception – a factor for which we should all be grateful.

Quantum of Solace (2008)

With QUANTUM OF SOLACE, the next generation of James Bond films continue in the satisfying mold established by 2006’s CASINO ROYALE. In other words, the familiar franchise elements are on display (cars, guns, women, martinis), but they are treated seriously, instead of tongue-in-cheek. The truly amazing achievement is that – after all these years and all the bad puns, self-parody, and formulaic regurgitation – the new Bond films manage to make the audience take 007 seriously again, instead of smirking at the same-old-same-old.
Marking the first full-blown sequel in the franchise (the old films had some continuing characters and the odd reference to previous events, but little direct continuity), QUANTUM begins where CASINO left off, with Bond delivering Mr. White to M for interrogation about the mysterious organization that blackmailed Vesper Lynd into betraying Bond, resulting in her death (more or less by suicide). A mole inside MI6 effects Mr. White’s escape, and the rest of the film follows 007’s attempts to find a thread that will reveal White’s organization. This leads to another villain, Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), who is engineering a coup in Bolivia for reasons that will benefit the organization.
Without the template of an Ian Fleming novel, QUANTUM’s screenplay (by Paul Haggis, Neal Purvis, and Robert Wade) wanders a bit. CASINO ROYALE did not stick closely to the book, but it retained almost all of the essential plot points, creating a solid structure upon which the screenwriters could elaborate. This time, they seem to lose track of the plot: Bond starts off trying to track down an organization and ends up bringing down merely one man; meanwhile, Mr. White is completely forgotten. And 007’s tracking efforts, far from showing his skills as a super-spy, really come down to lucky coincidence that the script hopes we will not notice: this installment’s Bond girl Camille (Olga Kurylenko) literally drives up out of nowhere and tells him to get in the car – a lazy plot device that literally drives the rest of the film.
Fortunately, we can forgive these lapses because the story is as much about Bond himself as about tracking down the bad guys. QUANTUM OF SOLACE actually manages to continue the character arc that began in CASINO ROYALE. One would have thought that the previous film had developed the character to the point where he was fully formed and ready to go on a series of missions without looking back, but QUANTUM OF SOLACE continues his maturation process.
This is a Bond film where emotional moments are as powerful as the action. It is genuinely touching to see 007 knocking back his signature martini (3 measures Gordon’s gin, one measure vodka, 1/2 measure Kina Lillet, shaken over ice and served with a thin slice of lemon peel) – because (although it is not mentioned in this film) we know that he named the drink after Vesper in CASINO ROYALE. This is the perfect use of what Hitchcock called the “Plastic Material” – objects, costumes, props, settings that tell us what is going on in the character’s mind. Bond need not deliver a mournful and uncharacteristic soliloquy about the depth of his sadness over the betrayal and death of the woman he loved; he expresses it in a way that maintains his macho mystique.
On this level, the story succeeds perfectly, taking the young 007 to the next level. A running joke in the film is that Bond leaves a trail of dead bodies wherever he goes – usually suspects who might have provided useful information if he had managed to avoid killing them. Threaded into this equation is the X-factor of how deeply Bond mourns the loss of Vesper: Does he want to avenge her? Or is he a “cold-hearted bastard” who just wants to get on with the job? And which would be preferable? These questions are nicely resolved in the denouement, which also ties up the loose thread about Vesper’s former boyfriend (the one who was supposedly kidnapped and tortured, until she agreed to betray Bond).
Some critics made comparisons to the Jason Bourne franchise, but this seems a bit misguided. The Daniel Craig version of 007 returns to the character’s roots in the original novels. Author Ian Fleming wrote about pain, fear, and the combination of courage and endurance that it took to overcome them and keep going anyway. That is very much what we see in Craig’s Bond.
The difference is that the screenwriters have extended the character’s reach: he is no longer affected only by the visceral impact of physical torture, body blows, and knife wounds; he also carries around hidden emotional scars. It never would have occurred to Fleming to have Bond seriously distraught. Even the maiming of Felix Leiter in Live and Let Dieis merely a plot device to fuel revenge – Bond spends precious little time feeling sorry, and Fleming avoids providing a man-to-man scene where Bond comforts his stricken friend; in fact, Leiter simply disappears from the novel. Compare that with the relationship between Bond and Matthis in QUANTUM OF SOLACE, in which fatal consequences provoke not just a desire for revenge but also the pang of regret.
Not everything works so well; in fact, the film suffers from a few gaffs so obvious it’s hard to understand how the survived into the final cut. One pretty (and of course disposable) female agent shows up wearing a raincoat that reveals no visible signs of any kind of clothing underneath; she literally looks like a set-up for a bad sight gag that never appears. (On the plus side, her demise deliberately evokes a similar image in GOLDFINGER, although this time the beautiful body is covered in “black gold” – i.e., oil.) There is also an unbelievably bad moment where Bond disposes of the body of a friend by callously tossing him in a trash dumpster and insisting that the dead man wouldn’t have cared – a line that brings derisive laughter from the audience.
Perhaps most distressing is the interrupted interrogation of Mr. White, which strongly hints that torture is on the agenda. Films and TV shows have been celebrating the “taking off the gloves” approach since 9/11, and one hardly expects Bond to express any liberal pieties about international law and civil rights. Yet it is hard to imagine that, having suffered through being tortured in CASINO ROYALE, Bond would not have some pretty strong feelings on the subject. If nothing else, he should doubt its efficacy: after all, he suffered as much as a man can endure and still refused to crack, and even if someone confesses under torture, one can never be sure whether the confession is genuine or merely offered up in order to make the torture stop.
Kurylenko, as the new Bond girl, is properly exotic, and her revenge sub-plot dovetails nicely with Bond’s mission. However, her back story is a bit of a stretch: she’s half Russian and half Bolivian, the screenplays way of retaining the exotic European feel of the Bond world while tying her into the South American plot. Alas, try as she might, she cannot hope to compete with Vesper Lynd, but then – who could? (Well, maybe Tracy Bond, but the new series of films will have to wait a while before tackling that subject.)
Almalric’s Mr. Greene follows in the footsteps of Mads Mikkelsen’s Le Chiffre, offering up another effectively evil Euro-villain – this one more laid back than most, with more than a faint wiff of sleaze underlying the charm. (For some reason, he reminds one vaguely of Roman Polanski, for whatever that’s worth.)
Action scenes are imaginative and exciting, but they suffer from the attempt to top CASINO ROYALE – they are over-edited to the point where the slam-bang impact outweighs both the suspense and the joy – you sometimes can barely get a glimpse of the incredible action, which is so cool you wish the camera would linger a bit more. By contrast CASINO ROYALE’s work was clean and efficient: the movement itself was enough to take your breath away; you didn’t need the extra added layer of hyper-editing.
To his credit, director Marc Forster handles the drama much more astutely, serving up the performances in a way that allows the actors to do their job, unhindered by excessive technique. This allows the audience to invest in the core story, as Forster and the cast mine the script for the emotional resonances. You expect to be thrilled, but you don’t expect to shed a tear in a Bond film. This may be the first time in the franchise’s history where the drama outweighs the derring-do.

QUANTUM OF SOLACE (2008). Directed by Marc Forster. Written by Paull Haggis and Neal Purvis & Robert Wade. Cast: Daniel Craig, Olga Kurylenko, Mathieu Amalric, Judi Dench, Giancarlo Giannini, Gemma Arterton, Jeffrey Wright, David Harbour, Jesper Christensen.

Playing James Bond: Interview with Pierce Brosnan

His tenure as James Bond may have been cut off before he achieved his ultimate goal – surpassing Sean Connery as cinema’s greatest super spy – but Pierce Brosnan did something very important: he helped bring the character back to life. The films had gone through a phase of self-parody during Roger Moore’s tenure, reaching a low point with A VIEW TO A KILL (1985), and the attempt to return to a more serious tone with Timothy Dalton had fallen flat due to weak scripts and a reluctance to abandon the over-the-top antics for which the series had become famous. For example, the stunt-and-effects-packed chase scene in LICENCE TO KILL [1989] detracts from the dramatic core of the story, which is the personal conflict between Bond and the drug lord Sanchez. After the box office disappointment of LICENCE, the Bond seemed all but dead, and the franchise lay dormant for six years, until Brosnan stepped in.
007 purists were not necessarily happy with the casting of Brosnan. When he was first mentioned as a potential Bond back in the 1980s, there was some grumbling from hardcore fans who were worried that they would be getting another Roger Moore, with a cool, tongue-in-cheek interpretation. However, with Brosnan as Bond, the films harkening back to the days of Sean Connery, seeking to strike a balance between drama, witty one-liners and action-packed violence (even if they did not always fully succeed).
Continuing somewhat in the direction of Timothy Dalton, Brosnan moved away from playing Bond as the tongue-in-cheek spoof. “For me, he is a human being,” the actor. Said. “To come into the role the first time round, it had such a mighty mythology to it. How do you make it real for yourself; how do you find your [own way]? Because what Fleming put down on paper and what Connery did in the beginning are two different things, really; there’s two different men. So you have to find the man for yourself. You pose the questions to yourself, ‘What if I were this man?’ He’s highly trained, respected, solitary. A survivalist. Doesn’t simply like trying to kill anybody, but kills. Is always looking over his shoulder. Drinks too much. Did smoke too much at one time but has given up–I think he has a quiet cigarette behind the set. For me, it was just trying to make him human, and that’s a dangerous thing to do with any kind of fantasy-figure character.”
That’s not the way things might have turned out, if Brosnan had taken over in the 1980s. “I think someone was watching over me with respect to doing it back in ‘86,” he declared. “I’ve got photographs of me with the late Cubby Broccoli, signing the contracts, standing outside the soundstage with his Rolls Royce. I look like something out of LEAVE IT TO BEAVER. I mean…it’s Remington Steele. So I was lucky that I didn’t do it then, very lucky.”
Of stepping into the role first made famous on screen by Connery, Brosnan said, “Well, going into the ring, it’s about taking the belt. Connery’s got the belt; I want the belt. It’s as simple as that. It’s a game; the whole bloody thing’s a game. You go in knowing that there’s only one man in the ring. There’s that analogy, which is kind of dramatic and makes for good copy, but there’s also just one’s own self esteem and respect for the character, respect for the millions of people who loved the character. Doing GOLDENEYE [1995] was huge. The tension was there from Day One when I put the phone down after my agents said, ‘You’ve got the job,’ right through to finishing the press junket. And Connery was the Man. He was Bond; he was the one I grew up on. You have this kind of thing of wanting to take the belt, but you also have to find your own path with it and not get too blind-sided by the competition and someone else’s performance.”
Part of humanizing Bond in the Brosnan movie results from twisting familiar situations in unexpected ways: for instance, casting a woman (Dame Judi Dench) as M. “He does love this woman,” says Brosnan of Bond’s boss. “She’s a Bond babe—she is THE Bond babe. So there is a great love and respect, and I wanted to see more of that.”
This is in keeping with one element that Brosnan has emphasized in order to distinguish his characterization: a more obvious compassion for the women in the Bond films. This was on view in TOMORROW NEVER DIES vis-à-vis Teri Hatcher, suggesting a certain vulnerability not always apparent in previous Bond films. “I cannot do, nor do I want to do, what Connery did,” Brosnan says. “Nor do I wish to do that kind of character who smacks women around and smacks them in the mouth. I mean, he could do it, and he has done it: with Famke Janssen in GOLDENEYE, he gives her a ding in the jaw, but then she deserves it.”
This is all part of a move toward pushing Bond into a morally gray area. “That is good,” said Brosnan. He added that Bruce Fierstein, who scripted several of the Brosnan Bond films “always talked in that gray area of ambiguity from the beginning. I think GOLDENEYE had it in miniscule amounts, maybe in one particular sequence on the beach with Izabella Scorupco. The second film, I think they wanted to be so bigger and bolder and brasher than the first in that it was just wall-to-wall action. But [in THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH] they allowed us to have story, to have character-to have interaction of character and subtext of character, and subtleties. So you have this incredible heroic character, but there is that gray area—an elliptical side to him—and that’s what intrigues me: how far you can push that and how far you can go with that, without pulling it all down. “
Brosnan also wanted to take the character “one step further. You have a rating, which is PG, which should always be there. But there’s a part of me that would love to do an R-rated Bond, or just take the PG rating off it and do it—not for real, because you want the fantasy—but just to see some surprises and explores facets of the character more.”
He added, “I’d like to see him just alone on the stage there — how it all affects him, the mission, the killing of someone. We see a little bit in this, but he’s so heroic and always gets the job done; he always has the gadget at hand. But what happens when he doesn’t have the gadget at hand? What happens when it goes wrong? What happens when it’s the betrayal that he deals with in his life the whole time?”
Despite what seems like a perfect fit, Brosnan insisted that playing James Bond was not a life-long dream. “I have read that it was my life ambition to play this role and that I dreamt of playing this role—which is complete untruth. I grew up watching the Bond movies, and they certainly sparked my interest in cinema at the age of ten when I saw GOLDFINGER. But I never wanted to be Bond or dreamt about being Bond. It wasn’t until I was doing REMINGTON STEELE that these mutterings were going on about me being Bond, because my late wife had done a Bond movie and because we knew the Broccoli family. I guess he and I were just meant to meet: destiny, destiny, destiny. There was no getting away from it.”
With his tenure in the role over, one might wonder what Brosnan expects for the future of the role. How will the Bond of the new millennium compare to past Bonds?
“Oh, I couldn’t be so presumptuous to answer that question. I don’t know. Time will tell.”

Copyright 2004 Steve Biodrowski

Producing 007 – A Retrospective Interview with Michael G. Wilson

The man perhaps most responsible for overseeing the James Bond franchise (along with his half-sister, Barbara Broccoli) is Michael G. Wilson. Wilson has been a part of the 007 series since with THE SPY WHO LOVED ME in 1977. Not only has he produced ten of the films; he also contributed to the scripts for five of them. Working first under the auspices of producer Albert Broccoli (Wilson’s stepfather, who launched the series, along with Harry Saltzman, back in 1962), Wilson helped revive interest in Bond’s exploits after a certain decline during the early to mid-‘70s. During the ‘80s, he oversaw the gradual move away from the light-hearted, humorous turn the series had taken with Roger Moore, back toward a more serious direction with Timothy Dalton. Since the death of Albert Broccoli, Wilson and Broccoli’s daughter Barbara have been carrying on the family tradition. In the 1990s they revived flagging interest in the series with the casting of Pierce Brosnan as Ian Fleming’s famous spy. Now in the new century, they are looking for a new Bond who will connect with younger viewers (much as Warner Brothers hopes to lure young viewers back to their Batman franchise with a new and younger caped crusader). In the following interview, Michael G. Wilson discusses his role in maintaining the super spy’s amazing longevity.
HOW DOES A GREAT BOND FILM COME TOGETHER?
Well, we have a great team, and that team has been with us for many years. Their fathers and sometimes their grandfather’s are with us, and they all pull together. They all have an investment; they all want it to succeed, and that spirit comes across and makes it work.
IS IT HARD COMING UP WITH PLOTS NOW THAT YOU’VE RUN OUT OF FLEMING NOVELS?
Plots are always needed. It’s really coming up with a good story that’s the key thing. It’s not something that the audience appreciates in the sense that, if you ask them what they like about the film, they usually don’t mention it. But if it’s absent, they won’t like the film. It’s almost a kind of unconscious, visceral thing. They really want a good story; they just articulate it. That’s why when people do research and stuff, they miss out. We do a lot of research. A lot of the series that you’ve seen that have come and gone have listened to the audience and then tried to write scripts according to what the audience says. The audience generally remembers the stunts and the action, so they just keep on getting more and more stunts and action, and letting the story go. Before you know it, they don’t have a series anymore.
HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED USING, FOR INSTANCE, THE JOHN GARDNER NOVELS AS THE BASIS FOR FILMS?
I haven’t…I read many of the John Gardner novels, and now there’s another fellow writing them, but I haven’t felt they have the things that would make good films.
YOU HAVE TO KEEP COMING UP WITH GREAT OPENING SEQUENCES. WHAT ARE SOME IDEAS YOU’VE THROWN OUT?
Well, I guess I can’t even think of what we’vethrown out. There’s a big pile of stuff, and sometimes we go back to the bone pile and say, ‘What’s in there?’ The opening sequences really are kind of two categories. One is Bond’s just finishing a mission, and it’s basically just puts you into Bond’s world. The other ones fulfill that function but also set the story up. The way we conceive of the film opening, we start with the iris and the gun. That to show you Bond’s being stalked. He lives in a world where there’s assassins, and he has to be able to shoot faster than the next guy. But it’s also a portal into this movie world, this fantasy world. It’s kind of like your world but it’s a parallel world. It’s brighter. It’s exotic. People were tuxedoes when they don’t wear shorts. So we’re brought into that world, and that little opening sequence says, ‘This is the world we’re suddenly in.’ Then we go into the titles and this exotic, thematic background. That’s kind of the way we bring the audience in.
FOR DECADES THE FILMS CAME OUT LIKE CLOCKWORK EVERY TWO YEARS. NOT ANY MORE.
It doesn’t give me a problem to do one in three years instead of two. The studio may feel different, but these are very hard to put together. They take over your life. When we’re working on the script and production, my wife will say, ‘Do you realize you’ve been working seven days a week?’ So I don’t mind doing something else; to me it’s fine.
WHAT’S IT LIKE RELEASING A BOND FILM IN TODAY’S MARKET?
The way it works these days, nothing builds; everything comes out, and they hit you on the head with a hammer. You’ve got to go see the picture, and first weekend’s important, and everybody looks at the figures. But of course we’ve seen films that have gone on and on. Some of our films have; they just play through. I think, to me, that’s the most important thing, because almost any films you can get a big weekend out of it if you advertise it to death. The good films have legs, and they go.
THE PIERCE BROSNAN FILMS TRIED TO BALANCE DRAMA WITH VERBAL HUMOR.
Some better than others, I trust. I think it’s just a matter of trying to get a balance right. Sometimes we use too much humor, too many double entendres; sometimes not enough. As soon as you change anything, you get a flood of letters: ‘What happened to this? What happened to that?’ Other people write in saying, ‘It’s all right, except you’ve got too many double entendres.’
WHAT HAS BEEN THE RESPONSE TO HAVING JUDI DENCH AS M?
The idea of casting a woman as M, which we did in GOLDENEYE in 1994, came about because Stella Remington had taken over MI6 in London, so we had a woman in charge of MI6. We thought, ‘If we’re going to be contemporary and up to date, why not try it and see what it would be like?’ When you think about that, you then say, ‘Who can we cast in that kind of role?’ It turned out that Judi Dench was enthusiastic and ready to do it, and we thought, ‘Wow, we’ve got a great opportunity here.’ We’ve taken that and developed that idea, and she has a much bigger role in this film. The character of M has never had as large a role as in this film.
HOW DO YOU GO ABOUT SELECTING COMPOSERS AND PERFORMERS FOR THE THEME SONG?
We’ve had a lot of different forces acting on us in the music area over the years. We have a view, Barbara and I, that we should have the composer do the theme song, the title song, because the theme will be integrated throughout the score of the film. The lyric may be done by the performer or some other guy. We feel ballads by female singers probably work the best in the Bond films, so we aim for that.
WOULD YOU EVER CAST SEAN CONNERY AS A VILLAIN IN THE SERIES?
We haven’t considered that, but I would never rule out anything. Our basic philosophy is that we’re always looking ahead. If you have writers come in and pitch you ideas, you’d be surprised how many ideas sound the same: ‘I’ve got GOLDFINGER’S DAUGHTER—this is gonna be great!’ It’s always something along that line: they like to take something that they liked and repackage it in a way. But we’ve resisted too many looks backwards. We do some; we bring in characters we’ve used before, but we try to keep our nose pointed toward the future.
ANY CHANCE OF BRINGING BACK SPECTRE OR BLOFELD?
Well, with Spectre and Blofeld, the last film we did was DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER in 1971. When I talk about not looking backwards, that is looking backwards. We’ve kind of moved beyond that.
WELL, HE WAS IN “FOR YOUR EYES ONLY.”
The guy down the chimney? [laughs and quickly moves on to another question]
YOU HAVE GREAT DIVERSITY IN YOUR FILMS.
Well, you have to understand that our films our international. About seventy to seventy-five percent of our income comes from exhibition outside the United States, and there’s a lot of people out there from all different ethnicities, all different religions, all different backgrounds, and they’re all great Bond fans. So we have to make sure those people come to our films because we don’t do anything to alienate them, and we do things to encourage them to come. So having a racially mixed cast is important. Having people with different points of view is important. Having visual gags is important. I guess it’s always been global. We’ve always been a series that appealed outside the United States more than inside the United States. Now, most American films are almost fifty-fifty. We’ve been even from the beginning fifty-fifty. We were always considered to be an international phenomenon.
WHO IS YOUR FAVORITE BOND GIRL?
That would be telling! I can’t really say. If you’re asked to chose between your children, what do you say? They’ve all been great. Really, that’s tough. They’ve all been troopers. They’ve all worked hard. They’ve all done a lot for us. They come out and do publicity. They did that thing in Vanity Fair where they all came out. They’re all just wonderful.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT ‘AUSTIN POWERS’ SPOOFING THE BOND FILMS?
People find them funny and great. I think they’re probably not pitched exactly at my age group. But I guess if you can be spoofed and you’re big enough to be spoofed, you’re lucky. If people take the time and trouble to spoof you, it must mean you’re a household name.
WHAT KEEPS THE BOND FRANCHISE GOING?
Bond’s a contemporary character, and we keep trying to make it contemporary. With the changes in casting, the five Bonds we’ve had, the fact that each one of them brings something different to it plays it a different way, has kept it going.
DO YOU THINK IT’S THE ACTOR OR THE CLIMATE THAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SUCCESS?
Certainly, Sean and Roger were extremely successful. Pierce has been extremely successful. I guess it’s a combination of the people who come together, the political climate, the actors, the directors.
WHAT WOULD IAN FLEMING SAY TODAY?
I guess he’d say, ‘Wow, I can’t believe it’s still going on.’

Copyright 2004 Steve Biodrowski

World is Not Enough (1999) – Film & DVD Review

The James Bond films have not been `films` since FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE. Or, to put it more precisely, they have become `James Bond films,` a sort of genre unto itself with a well-established formula and a level of audience expectation that cannot be ignored without peril. Elements like credibility and drama take a back seat to exotic locations, beautiful women, clever quips, fast-paced action, exciting stunts, lavish sets, and elaborate effects. While movie audiences eat this up with each new entry in the series, the Bond purists, those who remember the character as he appeared in Ian Fleming`s novels, yearn for a return to a more serious Bond. Not that the novels were without their outrageous elements (come on, 007 fought a giant squid in the novel of DR. NO), but Fleming captured a sense of gritty reality amidst all the glamour. In fact, it was this sense of continual danger that was at the core of the books. As Timothy Dalton was fond of pointing out, Bond`s vices (smoking, drinking, women) were an oasis from his everyday reality. This was a man who could die any day, at any moment, so he took his pleasures where he found them.
In the films, these elements, which had been for Bond a mere respite, became instead the true focus of attention. Especially during the Roger Moore era, Bond became a fantasy of what a secret agent would be: an infallible, good-looking superhero who never got his hair mussed, always won the fights, and never seemed in real danger (although Moore did perfect a comic grimace he used whenever faced with a supposedly imposing enemy, such as Richard Kiel`s Jaws).
Of course, Sean Connery had shown that it was possible to play this character as if it were the real thing. Maybe the actor wasn`t exactly what Fleming had in mind, but he did sell the character to the audience. Although he was ever ready with a quip, his sense of humor somehow never attacked the integrity of the film itself: while you were watching, you were in that world, and your suspension of disbelief remained in place.
With Dalton, fans got a return to a hard-edged, serious Bond. Unfortunately, the actor was ill-served by his films, especially LICENCE TO KILL, which was, theoretically, designed as a showcase for his interpretation of the character. What emerged from that debacle, however, was an abject lesson in how resistant the series had become to change. While we were supposed to take the film seriously, the same outrageous stunts and action intruded at regular intervals (in the film`s low point, the incredibility of Bond`s actions actually becomes a plot point, making the villain distrust the henchman relating the events). While we are supposed to be thrilled by the personal vendetta between Bond and Sanchez (an excellent Robert Davi), that element is all but eclipsed by a closing chase scene that replaces the actors with stunt men and abandons drama for action.
Sadly, Dalton never got another chance to make the role his own. Instead, after a six year gap, we got Pierce Brosnan as a new Bond for the `90s. What immediately became apparent in GOLDENEYE was that Brosnan, despite his REMINGTON STEELE background, was not going to play the lethal secret agent like a walking self-parody. Unlike Dalton, he imbued his Bond with humor, but unlike Moore, he wasn`t reluctant to explore the serious side of the character. In effect, he tried to combine the best elements of Moore and Dalton, creating a new version of 007 that in some ways harkened back to Connery.
TOMORROW NEVER DIES was a considerable improvement over GOLDENEYE. Somehow, the Bond elements clicked into place: great villain, great women, great action, great Bond. Yet somehow, in the build up to the release of THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH, the previous film has become the whipping boy-dismissed as all action and no story-and WORLD has been presented as the antidote, a film that alters the traditional Bond formula by infusing it with greater drama and characterization.
Well, I`m here to tell you that it just ain`t so. The film tries very hard, and sometimes the effort pays off, but overall this is a compromised effort that recalls LICENCE TO KILL in the wrong way: it`s a film that tries to be different but lapses back into the same old, obligatory set pieces. This is really too bad. After all, both Connery and Moore hit their stride with their third outing as Bond (GOLDFINGER and THE SPY WHO LOVED ME, respectively), and we had every reason to hope that the same would be true of Brosnan. As he has aged with each subsequent appearance, he has grown into the role: he has lost some of that boyish charm that threatened to make his Bond appear lightweight, and replaced it with a more seasoned sense of experience; in short, he`s starting to project the image of a man who`s been around the block a few times and knows where the bodies are buried.
Alas, this was not to be. THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH begins with an excellent pre-credits sequence that works because it undermines our comfortable expectations. After an initial adventure and narrow escape, the film doesn`t cut to the credits but goes to the headquarters of MI6, which are violated with a deadly explosion that precipitates an exciting boat chase down the Thames. The assault on a setting we are used to seeing used only as a means for exposition (to set up the plot) creates a genuine surprise, and the boat chase works with only a few gimmicks, instead opting for visceral impact. The whole sequence is over-the-top in the best Bond manner: thrilling in a fun kind of way but not so absurd as to render its hero in cartoon superhero terms.
Things proceed well with the opening credits and theme song–a fine tune composed by David Arnold and performed by Garbage that recalls the classic Bond themes like `Goldfinger.` But then the movie proper starts, and the plot kicks in. The big mistake that follows is that the filmmakers obviously want to render a film with more dramatic impact, but they are afraid to sacrifice the traditional elements in order to achieve this. The result alternates between slow dialogue scenes and intrusive action scenes; worse, the two elements are often not well integrated. The worst example of this is the helicopter attack on the caviar factory. At a time when the films should be barreling headlong toward the rescue of M (Judi Dench), instead it stops for a set piece that in no way advances the story. Far more damning, it`s not such a great scene that it justifies its own existence. There are lots of shots of damage being inflicted, lots of shots of people running, but no sense of danger or suspense, no sense of narrative–of people gaining or losing the upper hand, or turning the tide against their attackers. The sequence might have been just tolerable if it had ended when Bond`s car launches a rocket that explodes the copter, but no–there is a second helicopter, allowing the sequence to drag on even further, to no real advantage.
The problem, clearly, is that Michael Apted is no action director, so he apparently lavished his attention on the character scenes and left the second-unit people to do what they wanted, whether or not it meshed with his work. What was really needed was an approach like that of James Cameron or John Woo, who know that action is character-how a character behaves under duress or in danger is as much a part of storytelling as what he says when alone with another person.
With the attempt at drama thus undercut, the film`s pace drags woefully in the middle. The attempt to play Electra King (Sophie Marceau) as a believable love interest (rather than just a sex object) is partially successful, but it never generates as much heat at Teri Hatcher`s role in TOMORROW NEVER DIES-and she had much less screen time, to boot. The film`s twist, that Electra is the real villain of the story, does work fairly well (at least it`s not obviously telegraphed), but we never understand her conviction that Bond won`t have the nerve to kill her. Certainly, we in the audience never believe he will hesitate, and when the big moment finally comes, Apted throws it away with a reaction shot to M, instead of focusing his camera in on the faces we want to see in this critical moment of life and death: Bond and Electra.
At least, Marceau is more than just beautiful; her accent and European looks are appropriately exotic for a Bond movie. The same cannot be said for Denise Richards. Sure, she is gorgeous enough to be a Bond woman, but in the middle of a film striving for greater characterization, her Dr. Christmas Jones is an underwritten tag-along character with little to distinguish her. Worse, she is saddled with unspeakable techno-babbble dialogue that recalls a bad episode of STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION. The result, sadly, provokes laughter in all the wrong places. Again, using TOMORROW NEVER DIES as a point of comparison, Michelle Yeoh managed to present herself as a worthy colleague to Bond, and her martial arts skills gave an added punch to the film. With Dr. Jones, we wonder why Bond is even dragging her along. (Yeah, I know, she`s supposed to diffuse the atomic bomb, but Bond knows how to do that himself-or at least, he had learned by the time of OCTOPUSSY.)
Robert Carlyle pulls a few worthwhile moments of unexpected vulnerability out of the villainous Renard, but the character does not rank among Bond`s most memorable foes. Carlyle projects far more danger as the volatile barroom brawler in TRAINSPOTTING. Here, is almost subdued. This supposedly more realistic opponent simply lacks the larger-than-life flare that Jonathan Pryce brought to TOMORROW NEVER DIES.
The script has some good points. The dialogue is often witty, but for every clever line, there is at least one howler (like the film`s closing pun about Christmas coming more than once a year). At least Desmond Llewelyn and John Cleese make the most of the traditional gadget scene. Llewelyn is in fine form, finally with someone else to play off of rather than just Bond; in fact, it`s fun to see Q and 007 have a third party as the target for jibes so that at last they can stop sparring with each other. The hints of surrogate father-son loyalty actually fill the screen with some genuine warmth. And Cleese, of course, is a scream as Q`s apprentice. He gets more laughs in a few minutes than are to be had in the rest of the film.
Okay, so THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH aims to achieve something more than its predecessor and trips up on its own ambition. Does that make it a bad Bond movie? No, despite the lags in pacing, the film does deliver the goods. There are delightful moments, some good set pieces, occasionally surprising plot twists; Maria Grazia Cucinotta is so good as the lethal lady in the opening sequence that we miss her presence throughout the rest of the film, and Brosnan giving a more mature performance as Bond. There is even an effective torture sequence that recalls the grueling sense of pain and fear that Fleming put into his books. But in every way, the film is inferior to its immediate predecessor. It may be good p.r. to present the new Bond film as a dramatic antidote to the all-action formula of previous Bonds, but the truth is that some of those action packed movies (including TOMORROW NEVER DIES) did generate genuine emotional responses, often much more effectively than the current film. More than anything, a Bond film should be fun, movie-going entertainment. This film indeed delivers the goods; it`s just bogged down in an attempt to do more that ultimately delivers less.

DVD DETAILS

The special edition DVD presents the film with a beautiful picture and great sound, complimented by excellent computer graphics animation for the menus, but the audio commentaries and supplemental material represent a big too much self-congratulatory back-patting for those of us who found the film unbalanced and occasionally frustrating, despite its many fine sequences.

Besides the film itself, you get the film’s trailer, a music video featuring Garbage performing the title tune, and a souvenir booklet featuring some interesting facts, such as the tidbit that the title (the Bond family motto) originated in Ian Fleming’s novel On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. There are also two audio commentaries, several behind-the scenes clips, and a “making of” documentary that is a fairly typical promo piece, featuring brief interviews with Pierce Brosnan and Desmond Llewelyn.
The audio commentaries and the behind-the-scenes clips, called the “Secrets of 007,” can be accessed through “special features” in the menu. The DVD offers the option of having the “Secrets” interrupt the film. During key sequences, a 007 logo flashes on the screen; pressing “Enter” on your remote control takes you to the extra footage, which is presented without narration or explanation. Sequences covered include the boat chase, the opening titles, the hologram, the missile silo, and the submarine finale. Basically, what you get is images from the film intercut with shots of cameras filming the action, plus occasional storyboards and even, in the helicopter sequence, earl CGI renderings superimposed onto the live action plates. Perhaps the most interesting vignette shows how Bond’s X-Ray glasses were achieved: actors were filmed first with regular costumes, then again with special costumes revealing the shapes of guns beneath translucent clothing; then the two were matted together.
If you’ve already seen the movie and don’t mind having it interrupted, these sequences are fairly entertaining if not all the informative; certainly, no secrets are revealed, unless you’re someone who knows nothing about how films are made. If you don’t want to interrupt the film, you can access these clips by clicking on them in special features. This is especially useful if you’ve already watched the film twice (once for each audio commentary) and don’t want to sit through it again just for the behind the scenes footage. Actually, I had both the second audio commentary and the behind-the-scenes function running simultaneously on my second viewing, which worked out fine, as often the commentary provided helpful behind the scenes information that was then illustrated by the extra film clips. The only real downside of this approach is that the last “Secret” is followed by credits for the behind-the-scenes footage—the one time that sitting through the extra scenes really impede the flow of watching the film.
The first audio track features director Michael Apted; the second one includes production designer Peter Lamont, action unit director Vic Armstrong, and composer David Arnold. Both tracks are filled with information that should be of interest to Bond fans, but they are not as lively and entertaining as they could have been, perhaps because everyone is too busy praising the film’s virtues. Sure, there’s a lot to be proud of on view, but would it hurt here and there to admit that maybe—just maybe—things could have turned out a little better? (The closest we get is Arnold’s admission that he felt dubious about the script attempts to generate sympathy for Renard, who—after all—is planning to blow up 8 million people.)
Michael Apted, in particular, is guilty of still talking about Denise Richards as if her casting were a real coup, and no one is willing to acknowledge that killing off Maria Grazia Cucinotta before the opening credits leaves the film with a gaping hole that neither Richards nor Sophie Marceau is able to fill. Apted also re-roasts the old chestnut about wanting the Bond girls to be more than merely decorative; apparently, he is unaware that this is said by almost every director and actress who has worked on the franchise, almost from its inception. Overall, this is definitely an instance when an interviewer might have improved things considerably by asking a few pertinent questions; as it is, David Arnold never even gets around to explaining why there’s a song on the soundtrack album that’s not in the film itself (“Only Myself to Blame”).
Okay, not to be too harsh, here’s a quick sampler of some of the good tidbits you’ll discover (and this only a sampler; there are many more to be gleaned from the disc itself): Maria Grazia originally auditioned for the role of Electra King, but when Michael Apted didn’t think her English was up to the demands of the role, she accepted the smaller role of the Cigar Girl assassin just for a chance to work in a Bond movie. During Bond’s fall down the dome after dropping off the balloon, in several takes the stunt man missed the rope he was supposed to grab; the film’s editor suggested leaving in one of the misses before cutting to a shot of the successful grab. Producer Michael G. Wilson makes his obligatory cameo during the casino scene. Arnold took advantage of the same sequence to compose what he calls “John Barry” type music, thinking that the location lent itself to the loungy jazz approach. Pierce Brosnan’s twitching head, just before he kills Renard, visually echoes Robert Carlyle’s own mannerism as the villain, who tends to shake just before perpetrating each new atrocity.
And most interesting of all, the boat chase down the Thames that gets the film off to such a great start was originally not intended to be part of the pre-credits sequence. After preview audiences found the original opening (Bond’s descent down a rope to escape an office) unspectacular in the action department, the credits were pushed back until after the attack on MI6 headquarters (including the explosion that kills Electra’s father); with so much material pushed up front, the chase had to be shorted to prevent the sequence from running too long.
In short if you loved this movie, then this disc is the way to own it; or, if you’re a hard-core Bond fan who must have every film in his personal collection, you won’t be disappointed. But if you’re a casual viewer or one who was disappointed in the film itself, a rental of the disc will prove rewarding, but you won’t be disappointed when you have to return the DVD to the store.
One last complaint: Apparently, the audio commentaries were recorded before the death of the actor who has played Q since almost the beginning of the series, which goes almost totally unmentioned. Only at the very end, after the final credits have run, is there a suitable acknowledgment of his passing: “In Loving Memory of Desmond Llewelyn.” Certainly after such a long contribution to the films, his passing warranted more of a tribute than that.
NOTE: The original special edition DVD is now out of print. The title was re-issued, with new cover art, as part of one of the many James Bond box sets that have been released (usually to cash in on interest created by the release of a new film). At this time, the film was also released on DVD in a Two-Disc Ultimate Edition. You can find other DVD releases of the title in the Cinefantastique Online Store.
THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH (1999). Directed by Michael Apted. Written by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade and Bruce Feirstein, story by Purvis & Wade, based on the character created by Ian Fleming. Cast: Pierce Brosnan, Sophie Marceau, Robert Carlyle, Denise RIchards, Robie Coltrane, Judi Dench, Desmond Llewelyn, John CLeese, Maria Grazia Cucinotta, Samantha Bond.

Copyright 1999 Steve Biodrowski